11 Aug
2015
11 Aug
'15
3:03 p.m.
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, David Huberman wrote:
Strongly disagree. It relies on the NCC to do what the NCC has done well for 25 years: be a numbers registry. Where fraud is suspected or discovered, act in the best interests of the Internet. The NCC is well practiced in detecting and fighting fraud, and continually improves in this regard. Trust the NCC staff to do their jobs well; they know what they're doing.
Well, I would like to hear this from NCC itself in that case. From what I can see, RIPE NCC doesn't currently have to necessary text in the contracts and policies to enable it to do what you want it to do. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se