On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 14:10, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
If that's not sufficiently clear, we might need to reword.
The wording is clear once you know the intended meaning. Yet, after reading it twice, I was not certain that I understood the intent and all consequences of this rule before I read your explanantion. IMO, the main problem is that "additional" is ambivalent even though it's used in the first sentence, as well. Thus, I would suggest: The RIPE NCC will assign additional IPv4 addresses to an End User in order to pad the assignment size to a multiple of a /24 if an End User demonstrates: [...] Cumulatively, no more than 248 padding IPv4 addresses may be assigned to any particular End User for the purposes outlined in section 6.10. Richard