Trading is restricted by 2015-01. Don't you see it? Open the transfer statistics and look it. But WG find the problem where is not a problem. 2016-06-20 12:16 GMT+03:00 Gert Doering <gert@space.net>:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:56:47PM +1000, Arash Naderpour wrote:
This policy is not about "return allocations", but about reducing the burn rate by reserving /22s for those who actually want to run a network with it, instead of trade away quickly for a short gain.
When an allocation is not transferable to another member, one day they need to be returned to RIPE NCC.
Yes. But that's a side effect of not allowing transfers of these /22s.
Basically, the discussion *should* try to focus on this point, and not run around the mill with non-sensical arguments.
- do we want to restrict trading of "last /8 policy" /22s, yes or no?
If we want restrictions, then this will have consequences (like, if you close your LIR and are not selling off the whole business, the /22 will be returned).
If we want *no* restrictions, this will also have consequences - namely, some (few) people making money based on resources other folks have set aside to be there for the long-term good of the RIPE region, which many others see as immoral and abusive.
But do not complain about the potential consequences, please just answer the question.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-- ---------- Best regards, Aleksey Bulgakov Tel.: +7 (926)690-87-29