22 Nov
2010
22 Nov
'10
5:14 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:25, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
For us, it is :-9 - I'm not sure whether the routing-wg folks are going to like it...
I would argue that the specific WGs would have the final say on anything relating to them (if we end up using WG-specific prefixes), anyway. For example, ripe-rt- would work nicely.
Regarding the specific proposal, I can certainly see why you'd want this, and if there is enough backing here, I'll bring it up among the WG chairs and the RIPE NCC to see what can be done about it.
Thanks. Would/Should I write a proper proposal for that or would you just take it up directly? Richard PS: Yes, the RIPE is using RT for tickets, but I doubt they would want that namespace for RT.