Carlos Friacas wrote: [...]
Imho, those who wish not to contribute should not have access to the recovered resources. Solidarity (even if it's about a legacy resource...) sounds like a positive thing, however, if it's possible for non-contributors to benefit, another word comes to mind. And in that case i would be in favour of (3.) or (4.).
I think we should stop the mudslinging and name-calling. More so, as the actual behaviour of a particular region has been, and is, different from what is implied here.
Regards, Carlos
The folks from ARIN have very concisely explained what they believe are their legal boundary conditions to consider, and to respect. Whether we in RIPE-Land like those - or not - is a different story and outside the scope of a global policy discussion, imho... Thanks, Wilfried.