10 Mar
2011
10 Mar
'11
7:01 p.m.
Le 28 févr. 2011 à 10:29, Randy Bush a écrit :
I strongly support the idea of assigning a smaller prefix to ISPs which are in a state of deploying IPv6 but need to use transitional mechanism for (some of) their customers.
only problem is that 6rd is not a transition mechanism. it is an anti-transition mechanism.
Whatever you call it, it remains an effective way to rapidly offer native IPv6 addresses, and real IPv6 service, to customers. RD