I support this as-is, but I would hope we have the maturity to refine it if it becomes clear that it's not useful.
Niall
Hi fellow APWG members,
as the comment period for the v3 of 2007-08 is nearing its end (one week
left), please send your comments about it to the list.
Do you want to see this proposal implemented?
Do you absolutely refuse this proposal, and any movement in that direction?
Do you agree, in general, with the underlying idea, but need to see changes
in the specifics before this can become policy?
If there are no comments, it's a bit hard for the chairs to judge whether
we have consensus or not...
Gert Doering,
APWG chair
--
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
> PDP Number: 2007-08
> Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> The text of the policy proposal 2007-08 has been revised based on the community feedback. We have published the new version (version 3.0) today. As a result a new Review Phase is set for the proposal.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:
>
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-08.html
>
> and the draft RIPE Document at:
>
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-424-draft2007-08-v3.html
>
> We encourage you to read the revised proposal and the draft document, and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 16 October 2008.
>
> Regards
>
> Filiz Yilmaz
> RIPE NCC
> Policy Development Officer
>
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279