14 Sep
2015
14 Sep
'15
3:49 p.m.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 15:09, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote:
1) anything that increases the bureaucracy required to deal with the NCC for a first allocation is a non-goer.
2) I could live with giving a LIR which has only received an "austerity /22" another shot after a certain time, but I'd couple it with some proof of ipv6 deployment (beyond just advertising a /32)
If you have some ideas of how to reliably determine "real ipv6 deployment" *AND* write down that criteria in a policy-friendly way, you're welcome (want to be part of the proposal ? - ok). -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs