Hi.
a. Arguments supporting the proposal Faster depletion of the free IPv4 pool may force the adoption of IPv6 on certain members.
But there is conflict with 2015-01, was accepted to prevent depletion of the free IPv4 pool, wasn't it? This case we have to create 2015-10 to cancel 2015-01, or change the text of this one. 2015-10-20 17:01 GMT+03:00 <h.lu@anytimechinese.com>:
Based on current v6 deploy rate, my guess is in 5 years an new start up LIR would still appreciate a free /22 available for them.
On 20 Oct 2015, at 2:52 PM, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN <ripe-wgs@radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 15:16, h.lu@anytimechinese.com wrote: Sounds not bad idea, if current pool last us more than 5 years...but on the other hand, If it will shorten the lasting period below 5, I would not support it.
5 years seems borderline even with existing policy. Then, in about 3 years APNIC and LACNIC would have probbaly run out dry (ARIN already did) and spill-over to RIPE area could be expected. Just look at the existing us.* LIRs having only 185 v4 address-space.
-- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
-- ---------- Best regards, Aleksey Bulgakov Tel.: +7 (926)690-87-29