On 09/04/2008 06:23, "Frederic" <frederic@placenet.org> wrote: [...]
Today if i justify to receive a PI, i have it without any Contractual Obligation.
Can you please explain why you are concerned about contractual obligations? The current system is slightly ambiguous and it could be argued that this places registrants in a risky situation. The RIPE NCC could act capriciously, or make a mistake, and revoke an assignment. The (now ex) registrant would be at a disadvantage when they sought redress. I personally think the scenario described above is very unlikely but nonetheless, it is a possibility. In my opinion, introducing contracts is as much about protecting the registrant as it is about protecting the RIPE NCC and the community of network operators. Regards, Leo Vegoda