-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/05/2011 14:04, Nigel Titley wrote:
Mrtin, Malcolm On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 09:22 -0400, Martin Millnert wrote:
APWG,
We should all think real long and hard about the possible long-term implications of what this proposal sets the foundation for.
We *have* been thinking long and hard about this. This proposal is nearly three years old.
Working diligently on one particular solution is not the same thing. If you've investigated other approaches to inhibiting route hijacking and discarded them, please share. If you've merely assumed that this is the only/best/obvious/~ approach, I don't think it's unreasonable to suggest we should pause to see if we can come up with something else that doesn't turn control of routing from a distributed to a hierarchical system. Malcolm. - -- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd Maya House, 134-138 Borough High Street, London SE1 1LB Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3BU5cACgkQJiK3ugcyKhS2yQCfZMU0xL1blDWWKcDoKhEWEHHR jWkAoMeV6gW8wdk/Uhnt2s8MrellZTOq =mXh/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----