Remco, Surely that can't be the intention, or the policy would say that? It seems to revolve around the RIRs "recovering" IPv4 address space, and then returning that to IANA. But according to the IANA IPv4 page, every RIR has received at least one new /8 within the last 2 years. Since IPv4 usage is increasing in each region, I'm not sure when these IPv4 addresses are expected to appear. -- Shane On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:17 +0100, R.S. van Mook wrote:
Hi Randy -
I think the simple two-sentence summary would be something like this:
The current policy between IANA and the RIRs for allocating IPv4 will become unusable once IANA runs out. We need a new policy that keeps the structure between IANA and RIRs in place and gives IANA something useful to do.
That said, I sympathize with the proposal but I'm not sure if this is what we're looking for.
Best,
Remco
On 2/19/09 10:39 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
feliz,
can someone tell us what the actual intent of this policy is? like in a simple sentence or two?
randy
This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383.