- address-policy-wg - mailman.ripe.net

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses)
by Christoph Neukirch 04 Mar '13

04 Mar '13

Am 28.02.13 14:04 schrieb "Marco Schmidt" unter <mschmidt(a)ripe.net>: > >Dear Colleagues > >A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for >discussion. > > >You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-02/ > >We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to ><apwg-chairs(a)ripe.net> before 28 March 2013. > >Regards > >Marco Schmidt >on behalf of the Policy Development Office >RIPE NCC supported -- kind regards Christoph Neukirch

2 1

RIPE Policy Proposals 2012-02 and 2012-03.
by Matt Mather 04 Mar '13

04 Mar '13

Hi there, I am representing GTHL, AS31655 and I am trying to find out a little more about the polices mentioned in the subject line of this mail. I am particularly interested in when the current phase will to come conclusion and if proposals will either become policy or not. If you help shed some light on this I would appreciate it. Thanks and regards, Matt Mather. Matt Mather IP Design & Test Engineer [cid:175335.png@93d11731.469d99cb] +44 333 240 3348 [cid:a4dd06.png@ca9b06cb.4cb60299] +44 7848 026 072 [cid:2064f1.png@a37f7ca9.4fa780ae] matt.mather(a)gamma.co.uk [cid:f2ed08.png@33e479c2.45839582] http://www.gamma.co.uk [cid:image81cfba.JPG@07754e56.4a9e851f] Follow us [cid:image18ed05.GIF@bcc7563d.4f9c7814][cid:image018a85.GIF@21bb7df6.4190c541][cid:imagee5cab3.GIF@aca78f6f.4692f34b]<http://twitter.com/WeAreGamma> ________________________________ This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email postmaster(a)gamma.co.uk Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY.

2 2

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses)
by Milton L Mueller 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

Support > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg-bounces(a)ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg- > bounces(a)ripe.net] On Behalf Of Marco Schmidt > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:05 AM > To: policy-announce(a)ripe.net > Cc: apwg-chairs(a)ripe.net; address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net > Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of > requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses) > > > Dear Colleagues > > A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for > discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-02/ > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <apwg-chairs(a)ripe.net> before 28 March 2013. > > Regards > > Marco Schmidt > on behalf of the Policy Development Office > RIPE NCC >

1 0

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses)
by Anfinsen, Ragnar 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

Support. No need of a policy text not being used. MVH/Regards Ragnar > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg-bounces(a)ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg- > bounces(a)ripe.net] On Behalf Of Marco Schmidt > Sent: 28. februar 2013 14:05 > To: policy-announce(a)ripe.net > Cc: apwg-chairs(a)ripe.net; address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net > Subject: [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of > requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses) > > > Dear Colleagues > > A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for > discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-02/ > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <apwg-chairs(a)ripe.net> before 28 March 2013. > > Regards > > Marco Schmidt > on behalf of the Policy Development Office > RIPE NCC > >

2 3

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses)
by Roger Jørgensen 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt(a)ripe.net> wrote: > > Dear Colleagues > > A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for > discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-02/ supported... -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj(a)gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger(a)jorgensen.no

2 1

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses)
by Sascha Luck 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:04:38PM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote: >You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-02/ Support. cheers, Sascha Luck

2 1

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses)
by Mike Simkins 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

Support Mike. On 28 Feb 2013, at 13:04, Marco Schmidt wrote: > > Dear Colleagues > > A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for > discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-02/ > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <apwg-chairs(a)ripe.net> before 28 March 2013. > > Regards > > Marco Schmidt > on behalf of the Policy Development Office > RIPE NCC > >

1 0

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses)
by Sebastian Wiesinger 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

* Marco Schmidt <mschmidt(a)ripe.net> [2013-02-28 14:21]: > > Dear Colleagues > > A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for > discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-02/ Support -- GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant

1 0

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses)
by James Blessing 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

Support J On 28 February 2013 13:04, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt(a)ripe.net> wrote: > > Dear Colleagues > > A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for > discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-02/ > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <apwg-chairs(a)ripe.net> before 28 March 2013. > > Regards > > Marco Schmidt > on behalf of the Policy Development Office > RIPE NCC > > -- James Blessing 07989 039 476

2 1

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2013-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of requirement for certification of reallocated IPv4 addresses)
by Sascha Lenz 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

Hi all, Am 28.02.2013 um 14:04 schrieb "Marco Schmidt" <mschmidt(a)ripe.net>: > > Dear Colleagues > > A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for > discussion. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2013-02/ > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <apwg-chairs(a)ripe.net> before 28 March 2013. > even though i actually liked the intention of the current policy text, there seems to be no choice here but to support this change due to the lack of a certification policy. I don't really want to go there again for a while. So, support. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind Regards Sascha Lenz [SLZ-RIPE] Senior System- & Network Architect

2 1