- address-policy-wg - mailman.ripe.net

2010-06 is going to Last Call
by Shane Kerr 28 Jan '11

28 Jan '11

Hello, [ Courtesy copy sent to address policy and database working groups. Please follow up on the ipv6-wg list. ] The Review Phase for the RIPE policy proposal 2010-06 ended on 2010-12-27 (Monday, 27 December 2010). You can see the policy proposal here: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html There were some clarifications during the Review Phase, but nothing indicating changes needed. David and I have decided that the proposal is ready for a Last Call. (As co-author of the proposal, Marco has recused himself from any consensus judgments.) The last call period is four weeks, so will end 2010-02-03 (Thursday, 3 February 2011). Please e-mail any final comments to ipv6-wg(a)ripe.net before then. Thanks, -- Shane

13 12

2010-07 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
by Emilio Madaio 27 Jan '11

27 Jan '11

Dear Colleagues, The proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-451 has been withdrawn. It is now archived and can be found at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-07.html The reason for withdrawal is: the editorial text change proposed will be discussed in the Cosmetic Surgery Project Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

Proposed Implementation Plan for Policy Proposal 2010-06 in the RIPE Database
by Denis Walker 26 Jan '11

26 Jan '11

[Apologies for duplicate emails] Dear Colleagues, To prepare for the possible acceptance of RIPE Policy Proposal 2010-06, "Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments", the Database Group at the RIPE NCC proposes the following implementation plan. We will implement a new attribute ("assignment-size:") in INET6NUM objects, add some business logic for its use and add a new value (AGGREGATED-BY-LIR) for the "status:" attribute of an INET6NUM object. Schema and syntax changes in INET6NUM objects: - New attribute "assignment-size:" - Syntax is numeric value > 0 - INET6NUM object will include "assignment-size:" as an optional, single attribute - "assignment-size:" will not be an inverse searchable attribute - New value for the "status:" attribute of an INET6NUM object will be AGGREGATED-BY-LIR Business rules: - "assignment-size:" is optional in INET6NUM objects but required if "status:" is AGGREGATED-BY-LIR - The value of "assignment-size:" must be greater than the prefix size of the INET6NUM object containing the attribute - Parent status of INET6NUM object with status AGGREGATED-BY-LIR can be: ALLOCATED-BY-RIR ALLOCATED-BY-LIR AGGREGATED-BY-LIR - If parent status is AGGREGATED-BY-LIR, grandparent status cannot be AGGREGATED-BY-LIR - If an object has the status AGGREGATED-BY-LIR, a more specific object can only have the status AGGREGATED-BY-LIR (subject to the aforementioned constraints) We will prepare implementation of this plan during the week commencing 31 January 2011. It will be deployed during the week commencing 7 February 2011 should RIPE Policy Proposal 2010-06 be formally approved. Regards, Denis Walker Business Analyst RIPE NCC Database Group

1 0

2010-02 Proposal Accepted (Allocations from the last /8)
by Emilio Madaio 19 Jan '11

19 Jan '11

Dear Colleagues, Consensus has been reached, and the proposal for a change to RIPE Document ripe-498, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", has been accepted by the RIPE community. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-02.html The updated RIPE Document is ripe-509 and is available at: http://ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-509.html Thank you for your input. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

New AS Number Blocks allocated to the RIPE NCC
by Ingrid Wijte 06 Jan '11

06 Jan '11

Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC received the following AS Number Blocks from the IANA in January 2011. 56320-57343 57344-58367 197632-198655 You may want to update your records accordingly. Best regards, Ingrid Wijte Registration Services Assistant Manager RIPE NCC

1 0

2010-10 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
by Emilio Madaio 17 Dec '10

17 Dec '10

Dear Colleagues, A new version for the Global Policy Proposal has been presented at the RIPE 61 meeting in Rome. The new text has been produced and is now available for discussion. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-05.html We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net> before 12 January 2011. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 1

2010-07 New Draft Document Published (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
by Emilio Madaio 17 Dec '10

17 Dec '10

Dear Colleagues, The draft document for the proposal described in 2010-07 has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-07.html and the draft document at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-451-draft2010-07.html We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net before 13 January 2011. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

4 3

2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments)
by Emilio Madaio 13 Dec '10

13 Dec '10

Dear Colleagues, The IPv6 WG Chairs have decided that the proposal 2010-06 is ready for a 2 week Review Phase. Marco Hogewoning did not participate to the decision as he is a co-proposer. Following the feedback received, the draft documents for this proposal have been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published. You can find the full proposal at: http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-06.html and the draft documents at: http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-481-draft2010-06.html http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-new-draft2010-06.html We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to ipv6-wg(a)ripe.net before 27 December 2010. Regards Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

RIPE 60 Address Policy WG Meeting approved and published
by Emilio Madaio 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

Dear colleagues, The minutes from the Address Policy Working Group session from RIPE 60 were approved during RIPE 61. The minutes are available here: http://ripe.net/ripe/wg/address-policy/minutes.html Best Regards, Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

New IPv4 blocks allocated to RIPE NCC
by Andrea Cima 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [Apologies for duplicate mails] Dear Colleagues, The RIPE NCC received the IPv4 address ranges 5/8 and 37/8 from the IANA in November 2010. We will begin allocating from these ranges in the near future. The minimum allocation size for these two /8s has been set at /21. You may wish to adjust any filters you have in place accordingly. More information on the IP space administered by the RIPE NCC can be found on our web site at: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-ncc-managed-address-space.html> Additionally, please note that three "pilot" prefixes will be announced from each /8. The prefixes are: 5.0.0.0/16 5.1.0.0/21 5.1.24.0/24 37.0.0.0/16 37.1.0.0/21 37.1.24.0/24 They all originate in AS12654. More information on this "pilot" activity is available in the draft document "De-Bogonising New Address Blocks" which can be found at: <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-351.html> Kind regards, Andrea Cima Registration Services Manager RIPE NCC -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkz2My0ACgkQXOgsmPkFrjOT7wCgnNa0eUFwK/ebtSeus3YgMoxZ GnUAnRAPMBMth/eSgX2F/opnY0fQI+Co =z5iw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2