Dear Address Policy Working Group,
You can now nominate yourself as a potential co-chair for the Address Policy WG. You do this by writing to apwg-chairs(a)ripe.net with your name and your affiliation. Please do not self-nominate on this list.
I am not seeking reselection, so we need a new co-chair.
Send your nomination to apwg-chairs(a)ripe.net by 15 March.
We will publish the list of candidates on 23 March.
The candidates may then introduce themselves to the list. The Working Group will make its selection during the Address Policy WG session at RIPE 92 in Edinburgh.
If you are interested in serving as a co-chair of this Working Group, you are welcome to speak to Alex, Franziska, or me, to learn what we do off-list. Mirjam and Anna, as RIPE Chair and Vice Chair are also happy to answer any questions you have. And, you can also seek input from RIPE NCC staff and previous co-chairs.
Our selection process is documented here:
https://www.ripe.net/community/wg/active-wg/ap/address-policy-wg-chair-sele…
You can also read the Job Description here:
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-692/
A RIPE Working Group Chair Training course is available at the RIPE NCC Academy:
https://academy.ripe.net/enrol/index.php?id=16
Kind regards,
Leo Vegoda, for the co-chairs
Dear AP-WG,
While researching for my recent MENOG25 presentation, I noticed a transparency gap around IPv4 leasing — where LIRs delegate a block of address space to third parties who then operate it. A reportedly growing practice in our region and globally, driven by legitimate organisational needs for temporary IPv4 capacity. Yet there are no clear common guidelines for how LIRs should document who actually operates leased space, resulting in inconsistent registration practices. A sample taken of 50 leased prefixes showed multiple status attributes in use, only 26% with abuse contacts, and over half with no identification of the actual operator of the address space (or the ‘lessee’).
- The Problem -
Back in 2021, the RIPE Database Requirements Task Force established that registration data should be accurate to "facilitate contact with and identification of the organisation holding the assignment" (RIPE-767). The Task Force also strongly recommended that where a resource holder delegates resources to another entity, this should be documented.
Existing registration mechanisms can technically accommodate leasing — LIRs can create assignments or sub-allocations. But without specific guidance, these registrations frequently fail to identify the actual operator or provide functional abuse contacts. Research from the University of Twente estimated 6.1% of routed prefixes were leased in February 2025, and found leased prefixes then were 2.89× more likely to be blocklisted — a disparity that warrants examination regardless of root cause.
In practice, this means:
1. Rather than the actual operator of the IP block, abuse complaints frequently reach the LIR/lessor who may have no operational control
2. WHOIS often does not identify ‘who is’ actually operating the address space
- The Question -
Does the WG believe this transparency gap warrants discussion?
With ongoing IPv4 recycling, leasing may well become an increasingly common practice. Establishing clear registration expectations now seems preferable to addressing this retroactively.
- Possible Approaches -
If the WG sees value in addressing this, potential mechanisms could range from:
* A policy principle: where a third party operates leased address space, they should be identifiable
* Guidance on what information LIRs should document for consistency, including functional abuse contacts and lease duration
* A new status attribute (e.g., "LEASED PA") to explicitly reflect this distinct type of delegation of public IP space from an LIR to a third party
- Clarification -
'Standard' assignments — where the LIR provides services and retains operational involvement — are not in scope. This applies only where a third party operates the space without direct involvement from the LIR. No commercial terms or pricing need be disclosed — only who to contact and who is operating the space.
- Discussion Points -
* Is the transparency gap problematic enough to warrant action?
* What information would be operationally useful to capture?
* What implementation challenges or unintended consequences should we consider?
I have already consulted with stakeholders who see value in this direction, but I'm keen to hear broader perspectives from the WG.
Best regards,
James Kennedy
https://www.kipa.global
References:
University of Twente — "From Scarcity to Opportunity: Examining Abuse of the IPv4 Leasing Market" (2025): https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/497142547/tma2025_paper18.pdf
RIPE Database Requirements Task Force Report (RIPE-767): https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-767
*(Apologies for cross-posting)*
As a researcher, I have never come across a highly intensive and inclusive
book like "The Internet Ecosystem". The book englobes the whole Internet
Ecosystem with the correct information compared to misleading
information from blogs/wikipedia on the Internet. This book was reviewed by
Vint Cerf. I have just completed the reading, I will highly recommend it
and it is nice to have a copy to keep for reference.
Professor Peter Anderson
Head of Research
------------------------------
*From:* Nikesh B. Simmandree <nikeshbs(a)outlook.com>
*Sent:* Monday, August 18, 2025 1:35 PM
*To:* alac-announce(a)icann.org <alac-announce(a)icann.org>; alac(a)icann.org <
alac(a)icann.org>; at-large(a)icann.org <at-large(a)icann.org>;
afri-discuss(a)icann.org <afri-discuss(a)icann.org>
*Subject:* Launch of The Internet Ecosystem Book
Dear Community,
I am thrilled to announce the launch of my book, *The Internet Ecosystem* —
a comprehensive exploration of the history, architecture, governance, and
future of the Internet.
This book distills decades of technological evolution — from ARPANET and
packet switching, to AI, Web3, quantum networks, and beyond — into a clear,
engaging narrative accessible to both technical and non-technical readers
*What the Book Covers*
- *The Past:* How Cold War research, ARPANET, and packet switching gave
birth to the Internet we know today.
- *The Present:* The intricate roles of ISPs, backbone providers, cloud
infrastructure, AI, cybersecurity, and global governance shaping our daily
online experiences.
- *The Future:* Insights into 5G/6G, blockchain, immersive technologies,
quantum security, and the Internet in 2050.
With *49 detailed chapters*, the book provides a definitive yet
approachable reference for students, professionals, policymakers, and
curious readers alike.
My mission with *The Internet Ecosystem* is to make the Internet’s
complexity understandable — showing not only *how* the Internet works, but
also *why* it matters and has become one of the most transformative human
inventions — while sparking dialogue on how we build a secure, inclusive,
and sustainable digital future.
In the 21st century, understanding the Internet is not optional — it’s
essential. Whether you’re a business leader, policymaker, educator,
student, or everyday Internet user, this book provides the context and
clarity you need to navigate the opportunities and challenges of our
connected world.
*Get Your Copy*
*The Internet Ecosystem* is now available: https://payhip.com/b/hfvYg
Thank you,
Best Regards,
Nikesh B. Simmandree
+230-5-907-3413
nikeshbs(a)outlook.com
This message and its attachments are intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and are strictly confidential. If you have
received this in error, please delete it from any devices after having
informed the sender.
