April 2022 - address-policy-wg

Draft agenda - Address Policy WG at RIPE 84
by Leo Vegoda 25 Apr '22

25 Apr '22

Hi, We have a draft agenda for the Address Policy WG session on Wednesday, 18 May at RIPE 84. A. Introduction, including appointment of co-chair (10 mins) B. NRO NC Update (10 mins) C. Policy Update followed by Q&A (15 mins) D. Registry Services Update followed by Q&A 15 mins E. IPv6 Policy Goals report from community team followed by discussion (20 mins) F. IPv4 Waiting List (20 mins) - Recap - Find a volunteer to propose the policy G. Database Requirements TF recommendation for removing the requirement for IPv4 assignments (20 mins) - Recap - Discussion H. AOB/Open Mic (10 mins) We look forward to seeing you there in Berlin and online! Kind regards, Leo

1 0

Address Policy WG Co-Chair Selection Process - 2022
by Leo Vegoda 25 Apr '22

25 Apr '22

Dear Address Policy WG, According to our WG Chair Selection process, one of the WG chairs has to step down every two years, and a new WG chair is selected by the WG. Erik Bais is the co-chair whose term ends and he has volunteered to serve again. Other nominations are also welcome. If you would like to put your name forward then you may do so. Please send your name to James Kennedy (jameskennedy001(a)gmail.com) and me. Please include a short bio and your reason for applying. We will collect applications and publish them all on Monday, 25 April. The Address Policy WG will choose at RIPE 84 in Berlin. Kind regards, Leo Vegoda for the Address Policy WG Co-Chairs

1 2

Policy building - call for volunteers
by James Kennedy 10 Apr '22

10 Apr '22

Apologies for the previous formatting :) --- Community friends, Who would like to get involved in some policy building? Putting the “work” back into Working Group, we are seeking volunteers to follow-up on the following two RIPE Database Requirements Task Force recommendations relating to address policy. 2.1. The task force recommends that as resource holders have full responsibility over the registration of their IPv4 PA assignment(s), they are free to make assignments or not. If the community accepts this recommendation, the relevant RIPE Policies should be updated accordingly, and documenting IPv4 PA assignment(s) will stop being a policy requirement. 2.2. Following the data consistency principle, the task force also recommends resource registration requirements be applied consistently to all Internet number resources, regardless of their type or status. https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/tf/rdb-requirements-tf/database-requi… https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-767 Much of the heavy lifting has already been performed by the task force, and the recommendations have received positive feedback during previous RIPE meetings and BoFs. Please respond with your interest to this thread or directly to the Address Policy WG Co-Chairs. Regards, James APWG co-chair

3 3