-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Millnert [mailto:millnert@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:23 PM
To: Potapov Vladislav
Cc: slz(a)baycix.de; address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:37 AM, <poty(a)iiat.ru> wrote:
>>> And why wouldn't the Internet work with 600,000 prefixes in the DFZ?
>>
>> Now all of a sudden for instance Cisco 7600 3CXL isn't enough to old
a
> full table (at around 750k).
>>
>> Also, IPv6 uses twice the TCAM resources as IPv4...
>
> so, basically what you are saying is that you know that your routers
> need an upgrade in 5 years and you
> don't want to pay for an upgrade or you can't figure out a business
plan
> which covers the costs for that?
> But you are telling small ISPs/NCOs/"hobbyusers"/whatever THEY don't
get
> their business plan right
> if they don't can afford paying $$$ for PI space or rather would
prefer
> to pay other bills with the
> money? WTF?!
>
> ------
> No, the problem that the small ISPs you are speaking about will have
to
> spend that money to swallow such routing table. And it is not $2000,
> "slightly" more...
Not really; normal PC RAM is pretty cheap. 16GB ECC/REG ~400 EUR.
/M
--------
It's not about storing, it's all about using. And here we get to the
problem.
