January 2008 - address-policy-wg

Pushing 2007-01 forward
by Bernhard Schmidt 30 Jan '08

30 Jan '08

Hi, is there anything we (the community) can do to push 2007-01? http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-01.html Regards, Bernhard

2 1

Legal status of IP addresses
by Sander Steffann 28 Jan '08

28 Jan '08

Hello, For your information: Last week there has been discussion about the EU legal status of an IP address [1]. This is about whether an IP address can be used to identify an individual and the privacy and data protection implications. Sincerely, Sander Steffann Address Policy co-chair [1] http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/012408-eu-aims-to-clarify-legal.html?f src=rss-security

1 0

"Dirty" recycled network assigned
by Max Tulyev 28 Jan '08

28 Jan '08

Hello All, I just got an assignment for my client (large PI block). But this block is listed in all DNS RBLs and DUN lists, as it was in use till Oct'07 as dynamic DHCP pool of other big ISP. So my client says they can't use this network, because mail service is blocked. RIPE rejected my request to change this network to another one: "As we do understand how unfortunate this is for **********, there is nothing we can do about prefixes that appear on so called black lists." How can I solve this? -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)

12 21

2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
by Filiz Yilmaz 19 Jan '08

19 Jan '08

PDP Number: 2008-01 Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder Dear Colleagues, A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for discussion. With the acceptance of this proposal, the RIPE NCC will conduct a one-time operation to assign a /56 IPv6 PI prefix to all End Users with an IPv4 assignment registered in the RIPE Database. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-01.html We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net> before 12 February 2008. Regards Filiz Yilmaz RIPE NCC Policy Development Officer

27 62

2008-02 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
by Filiz Yilmaz 18 Jan '08

18 Jan '08

PDP Number: 2008-02 Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR Dear Colleagues, A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for discussion. With the acceptance of this proposal RIPE NCC will run a one-time operation to allocate an IPv6 block to every LIR that does not have any existing IPv6 holdings. You can find the full proposal at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-02.html We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg(a)ripe.net> before 12 February 2008. Regards Filiz Yilmaz RIPE NCC Policy Development Officer

2 1

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
by Marcin Gondek 16 Jan '08

16 Jan '08

Garry Glendown pisze: > Marcin Gondek wrote: >> If the price will be higher, then everybody join to RIPE as LIR. And >> then we will have +1000% of LIRs. Do "we" need this? >> Now everybody is waiting for some kind of statesment or procedure >> from RIPE side. >> > Price should be low enough to keep people from becoming an LIR > unnecessarily, but high enough to make them think twice about getting > space that they don't need ;) > Indeed -- Marcin Gondek / Drixter e-utp.net NIP: PL1181589645 REGON: 140584662 Tel. +48602159929 Fax. +48222012418 office(a)e-utp.net http://www.e-utp.net

1 0

PA vs PI routing pollution question
by Max Tulyev 07 Jan '08

07 Jan '08

Hello! As I send a lot of PI address space requests for my customers, RIPE hostmasters often says LIR is better than PI because of "That way they can receive as much contiguous (!) PA address space as they need." When I establish a new LIR, I write almost same request for PA, and it contains same address space usage plan for two years. PI networks requested after two years are not contiguous, and I understand why. Is it means RIPE reserve some contiguous network for future grow for LIRs? If yes, how big is this reservation? -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO)

1 0