TF Members, In following up regarding the latest revsions of the document each task force member should respond to the list approving this document as final document for publication, assuming no comments. Please respond as soon as possible as we would like to get this released to the ripe-list this week. Kind regards, William Accountability Task Force Chair From: accountability-tf <accountability-tf-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of William Sylvester <william.sylvester@addrex.net> Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 11:59 AM To: Accountability TF <accountability-tf@ripe.net> Subject: [Accountability-tf] Updated Accountability Document TF Members, Here is the revised accountability document. Please review and provide approvals, we would like to share this with the ripe-list as soon as we can achieve consensus. What has changed in this version: 1. The recommendations were numbered, they now correspond with the recommendations in the back of the document. 2. The RIPE Chair table (1.0) contains the roles in the updated ripe-174 document that was published after our review. “Not reviewed” was added along with a note in the introductory table. 3. We will want to remove the “Draft” off the title page and add a date when published to the community. 4. Malcom’s comments were considered but did not need to be incorporated. In regards to other feedback, we have determined that the task force recommendations for the alignment of WG chair is in scope and have retained this within the document. Thank you all for your review and I look forward to your comments and approval of the document. Thanks, William Accountability Task Force Chair
I approve. (In latest edition circulated in mailinglist) Alexander Isavnin вт, 7 мая 2019 г. в 21:59, William Sylvester <william.sylvester@addrex.net>:
TF Members,
In following up regarding the latest revsions of the document each task force member should respond to the list approving this document as final document for publication, assuming no comments. Please respond as soon as possible as we would like to get this released to the ripe-list this week.
Kind regards,
William
Accountability Task Force Chair
From: accountability-tf <accountability-tf-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of William Sylvester <william.sylvester@addrex.net> Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 11:59 AM To: Accountability TF <accountability-tf@ripe.net> Subject: [Accountability-tf] Updated Accountability Document
TF Members,
Here is the revised accountability document. Please review and provide approvals, we would like to share this with the ripe-list as soon as we can achieve consensus.
What has changed in this version:
The recommendations were numbered, they now correspond with the recommendations in the back of the document. The RIPE Chair table (1.0) contains the roles in the updated ripe-174 document that was published after our review. “Not reviewed” was added along with a note in the introductory table. We will want to remove the “Draft” off the title page and add a date when published to the community. Malcom’s comments were considered but did not need to be incorporated.
In regards to other feedback, we have determined that the task force recommendations for the alignment of WG chair is in scope and have retained this within the document.
Thank you all for your review and I look forward to your comments and approval of the document.
Thanks,
William
Accountability Task Force Chair
My support. Sent from my iPhone On 7 May 2019, at 20:59, William Sylvester <william.sylvester@addrex.net<mailto:william.sylvester@addrex.net>> wrote: TF Members, In following up regarding the latest revsions of the document each task force member should respond to the list approving this document as final document for publication, assuming no comments. Please respond as soon as possible as we would like to get this released to the ripe-list this week. Kind regards, William Accountability Task Force Chair From: accountability-tf <accountability-tf-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:accountability-tf-bounces@ripe.net>> on behalf of William Sylvester <william.sylvester@addrex.net<mailto:william.sylvester@addrex.net>> Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 11:59 AM To: Accountability TF <accountability-tf@ripe.net<mailto:accountability-tf@ripe.net>> Subject: [Accountability-tf] Updated Accountability Document TF Members, Here is the revised accountability document. Please review and provide approvals, we would like to share this with the ripe-list as soon as we can achieve consensus. What has changed in this version: 1. The recommendations were numbered, they now correspond with the recommendations in the back of the document. 2. The RIPE Chair table (1.0) contains the roles in the updated ripe-174 document that was published after our review. “Not reviewed” was added along with a note in the introductory table. 3. We will want to remove the “Draft” off the title page and add a date when published to the community. 4. Malcom’s comments were considered but did not need to be incorporated. In regards to other feedback, we have determined that the task force recommendations for the alignment of WG chair is in scope and have retained this within the document. Thank you all for your review and I look forward to your comments and approval of the document. Thanks, William Accountability Task Force Chair
My support too. Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad Op 9 mei 2019 om 02:20 heeft Malcolm Hutty <Malcolm@linx.net<mailto:Malcolm@linx.net>> het volgende geschreven: My support. Sent from my iPhone On 7 May 2019, at 20:59, William Sylvester <william.sylvester@addrex.net<mailto:william.sylvester@addrex.net>> wrote: TF Members, In following up regarding the latest revsions of the document each task force member should respond to the list approving this document as final document for publication, assuming no comments. Please respond as soon as possible as we would like to get this released to the ripe-list this week. Kind regards, William Accountability Task Force Chair From: accountability-tf <accountability-tf-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:accountability-tf-bounces@ripe.net>> on behalf of William Sylvester <william.sylvester@addrex.net<mailto:william.sylvester@addrex.net>> Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 11:59 AM To: Accountability TF <accountability-tf@ripe.net<mailto:accountability-tf@ripe.net>> Subject: [Accountability-tf] Updated Accountability Document TF Members, Here is the revised accountability document. Please review and provide approvals, we would like to share this with the ripe-list as soon as we can achieve consensus. What has changed in this version: 1. The recommendations were numbered, they now correspond with the recommendations in the back of the document. 2. The RIPE Chair table (1.0) contains the roles in the updated ripe-174 document that was published after our review. “Not reviewed” was added along with a note in the introductory table. 3. We will want to remove the “Draft” off the title page and add a date when published to the community. 4. Malcom’s comments were considered but did not need to be incorporated. In regards to other feedback, we have determined that the task force recommendations for the alignment of WG chair is in scope and have retained this within the document. Thank you all for your review and I look forward to your comments and approval of the document. Thanks, William Accountability Task Force Chair Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is gezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.
William, all, I have re-read the document as shared on March, 19th. I support the document as a final version. In particular, I support the 15 recommendations. Two obeservations: potentially as a side effect of not using original MS software, some of the recommendations seem to be slightly different from the text version when they appear in the final enumeration, with recommendation not being introduced in the full text? the text mentions that everybody participates on an individual basis but also says that the community consists of 'individuals and entitiues'. Finally, I do have a concern that the descreiption of consensus is goihg to be used as a normative recipe, which I think it should not. That said, let's go ahead with the doc! Best regards, Peter
participants (5)
-
Alexander Isavnin -
Malcolm Hutty -
Peter Koch -
Rullens, drs. W.M. (Wim) -
William Sylvester