Acountability TF Call Monday 2-Oct @ 14:00 UTC+2
TF Members, Monday (2-Oct) will be our next call at 14:00, Europe Summer Time (Amsterdam, GMT+02:00). The call and Webex details have been sent in a separate email. Here is the current proposed agenda: 1. Welcome, finalise agenda, adopt minutes 2. Review of open action items 3. Review from face-to-face meeting and preparations for Dubai (pre-meeting email & presentation) 4. Discuss input requested from community and how to receive feedback 5. Any Other Business (AOB) Please notify me with any agenda change requests. I look forward to speaking with everyone next Monday. William Task Force Chair
William, all - my sincere apologies! On 26.09.2017 16:48, William Sylvester wrote:
Monday (2-Oct) will be our next call at 14:00, Europe Summer Time (Amsterdam, GMT+02:00).
It's been only right now that I have realised that it's conf call time today: sorry - that entirely slipped through, even with last week's reminder. My bad. Best, -C.
All, As several people had conflicts and were unable to make the call today. We also felt it was better to have the F2F minutes and other details distributed with time to review. We decided to move the call till next week. Currently it is proposed to do a call on Monday 9-Oct. Please confirm by email if this works for you. Or if it does not work for you, propose a day next week that would at the time time and we will do our best to accommodate everyone. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, William On Sep 26, 2017, at 7:49 AM, William Sylvester <william.sylvester@addrex.net<mailto:william.sylvester@addrex.net>> wrote: TF Members, Monday (2-Oct) will be our next call at 14:00, Europe Summer Time (Amsterdam, GMT+02:00). The call and Webex details have been sent in a separate email. Here is the current proposed agenda: 1. Welcome, finalise agenda, adopt minutes 2. Review of open action items 3. Review from face-to-face meeting and preparations for Dubai (pre-meeting email & presentation) 4. Discuss input requested from community and how to receive feedback 5. Any Other Business (AOB) Please notify me with any agenda change requests. I look forward to speaking with everyone next Monday. William Task Force Chair
Yepp, works for me. On 02.10.2017 15:03, William Sylvester wrote:
[...]
Currently it is proposed to do a call on Monday 9-Oct. Please confirm by email if this works for you. Or if it does not work for you, propose a day next week that would at the time time and we will do our best to accommodate everyone.
[...]
TF Members, Monday (5-Feb) will be our next call at 14:00, Europe Standard Time (Amsterdam, GMT+01:00). The call and Webex details have been sent in a separate email. Here is the current proposed agenda: 1. Welcome back, finalise agenda 2. Review of open action items 3. Plan moving forward to RIPE 76 / Work plan for upcoming calls 4. Malcolm's document on consensus 5. Gathering TF feedback for the RIPE NCC to fit into document 6. Any Other Business (AOB) Please notify me with any agenda change requests. I look forward to speaking with everyone next later today. William Task Force Chair
Fellow TF members, On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 06:20:45AM +0000, William Sylvester wrote:
4. Malcolm's document on consensus
since I cannot make this call, let me just confrm that I have read Malcolm's documen, agree with the approach and think it is in scope for our work. There are some wording issues I'd like to see addressed ("disregard") might be proper legal English, but has connotations that indeed might match the perception of the person feeeling 'disregarded'). Also, the explanation centers a bit much around obstruction rather than dissent and it get's around numbers where I do not think it should. What I'd like to see emphasized, though, is that 'rough consensus' is a process more than a snapshot, and that's a process of discussion and (spoilert alert) compromise. Therefore, the degenerate 'social media' style +1 floods ar enot helpful. Also, while the intro says it won't discuss applicability of the paradigm, we could emphasize a bit more that some topics might a priori not well open then to 'rough consensus' (like personnel debates) and some topics fail that approach and this is discovered on the way (which is why the IETF applies tie breaking strategies). -Peter
participants (3)
-
Carsten Schiefner -
Peter Koch -
William Sylvester