I would be ok with this if it works for the other memebers. Thanks, William

On Feb 26, 2018, at 6:04 PM, Carsten Schiefner <ripe-wgs.cs@schiefner.de> wrote:

Andrew, all -

...

On 23.02.2018 15:04, Antony Gollan wrote: This is just a note to say that there will be no call this coming Monday. We will push the call back one week to Monday, 5 March at the usual time.

that would again be 14:00 +0100, I guess.

I am having a conversation over lunch coming up that day at 13:00 that is quite important to me but unfortunately cannot be rescheduled: therefore I wonder if our call can me pushed to one hour later, 15:00 +0100.

Thanks & best,

-C.

Dear all, I will be on holidays next week, so it makes no difference for me. consensus: the decision-making process was collaborative and consensus based and did not favour any particular stakeholder. Consensus means a general agreement, characterised by the absence of sustained opposition to substantial issues by any important part of the concerned interests and by a process that involves seeking to take into account the views of all parties concerned and to reconcile any conflicting arguments. Consensus does not imply unanimity; See link: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:316:0012:003... Best regards, Wim -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: accountability-tf [mailto:accountability-tf-bounces@ripe.net] Namens Carsten Schiefner Verzonden: maandag 26 februari 2018 22:04 Aan: accountability-tf@ripe.net Onderwerp: Re: [Accountability-tf] Next Call Scheduled for Monday 5 March On 26.02.2018 19:11, William Sylvester wrote:

I would be ok with this if it works for the other memebers.

So what shall I ask for: * expressed consent? * silent expression of no objection? Let me know! :-) Best, -C.

...

...

[...] We will push the call back one week to Monday, 5 March at the usual time.

that would again be 14:00 +0100, I guess.

I am having a conversation over lunch coming up that day at 13:00 that is quite important to me but unfortunately cannot be rescheduled: therefore I wonder if our call can me pushed to one hour later, 15:00 +0100.

Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is gezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.

Hi Carsten, It looks like there haven't been any objections. I'll send the WebEx details in a minute. Cheers Antony On 28/02/2018 18:10, Carsten Schiefner wrote:

All: is the rescheduling to 15:00 +0100 (14:00 UTC) set and sealed now?

Thanks & best,

-C.

On 26.02.2018 22:03, Carsten Schiefner wrote:

...

On 26.02.2018 19:11, William Sylvester wrote:

...

I would be ok with this if it works for the other memebers. So what shall I ask for:

* expressed consent?

* silent expression of no objection?

Let me know! :-)

Best,

-C.