Proposed Accountability TF Call Monday 4-Dec @ 14:00 UTC+1
TF Members, Today, Monday (4-Dec) is our next call at 14:00, Europe Time (Amsterdam, GMT+01:00). The call and Webex details have been sent in a separate email. We are going to change the format of this meeting, the intent will be to work through our list of open items and identify if we have an answer, need to defer to the community, or require additional information (if so what information). We will finish with a short discussion about what information needs to be sent to the community in response of the discussions at the RIPE meeting. Our goal will be to work on the details necessary for the report to the community. The secretariat will capture the discussion to share with the task force and revise existing documentation. Here is the current proposed agenda: 1. Welcome, finalise agenda, adopt minutes 2. Review of open action items 3. Review open questions to the task force. 4. Discuss follow up from RIPE meeting to the community 5. Any Other Business (AOB) Please notify me with any agenda change requests. I look forward to speaking with everyone later today. William Task Force Chair
William, all, First, my apologies for not being able to make this meeting. I had told Antony I'd be absent, but as it turns out (noticing TZ differences) I might manage to attend the first few minutes before I have to leave. Secondly, please find attached a first straw man draft of "Rough Consensus at RIPE", a discussion of what rough consensus means and the implications of using it. Further apologies for not having done this weeks ago. Pressures of work, of course. It's mostly "complete", in the sense there's only two sections I planned to write that I haven't started yet ("the critical role of the Chair" and "comparisons with IETF"). There may be more topics I haven't thought of; please let me know. Of course, as to the core of the paper, there may be additional categories of objections that can properly be disregarded in a consensus call, beyond those I have identified. Please let me know, or craft additional text yourselves. I hope you find it a useful contribution. Kind Regards, Malcolm. On 04/12/2017 02:10, William Sylvester wrote:
TF Members,
Today, Monday (4-Dec) is our next call at 14:00, Europe Time (Amsterdam, GMT+01:00).
The call and Webex details have been sent in a separate email.
We are going to change the format of this meeting, the intent will be to work through our list of open items and identify if we have an answer, need to defer to the community, or require additional information (if so what information). We will finish with a short discussion about what information needs to be sent to the community in response of the discussions at the RIPE meeting. Our goal will be to work on the details necessary for the report to the community. The secretariat will capture the discussion to share with the task force and revise existing documentation.
Here is the current proposed agenda:
1. Welcome, finalise agenda, adopt minutes
2. Review of open action items
3. Review open questions to the task force.
4. Discuss follow up from RIPE meeting to the community
5. Any Other Business (AOB)
Please notify me with any agenda change requests. I look forward to speaking with everyone later today.
William
Task Force Chair
-- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd Monument Place, 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
All - as agreed earlier today, please find attached my addition of a preamble to Malcolm's initial draft of the doc he has send around attached to his email cited below. Best, -C. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [Accountability-tf] Proposed Accountability TF Call Monday 4-Dec @ 14:00 UTC+1 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:49:53 +0000 From: Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> To: William Sylvester <william.sylvester@addrex.net>, Accountability TF <accountability-tf@ripe.net> [...] Secondly, please find attached a first straw man draft of "Rough Consensus at RIPE", a discussion of what rough consensus means and the implications of using it. Further apologies for not having done this weeks ago. Pressures of work, of course. It's mostly "complete", in the sense there's only two sections I planned to write that I haven't started yet ("the critical role of the Chair" and "comparisons with IETF"). There may be more topics I haven't thought of; please let me know. Of course, as to the core of the paper, there may be additional categories of objections that can properly be disregarded in a consensus call, beyond those I have identified. Please let me know, or craft additional text yourselves. I hope you find it a useful contribution. [...]
What I have forgotten to mention last night: On 05.02.2018 22:03, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
as agreed earlier today, please find attached my addition of a preamble to Malcolm's initial draft of the doc he has send around attached to his email cited below.
feel free to bash it where necessary, of course! :-)
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [Accountability-tf] Proposed Accountability TF Call Monday 4-Dec @ 14:00 UTC+1 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:49:53 +0000 From: Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> To: William Sylvester <william.sylvester@addrex.net>, Accountability TF <accountability-tf@ripe.net>
[...]
Secondly, please find attached a first straw man draft of "Rough Consensus at RIPE", a discussion of what rough consensus means and the implications of using it.
Further apologies for not having done this weeks ago. Pressures of work, of course.
It's mostly "complete", in the sense there's only two sections I planned to write that I haven't started yet ("the critical role of the Chair" and "comparisons with IETF"). There may be more topics I haven't thought of; please let me know.
Of course, as to the core of the paper, there may be additional categories of objections that can properly be disregarded in a consensus call, beyond those I have identified. Please let me know, or craft additional text yourselves.
I hope you find it a useful contribution.
[...]
participants (3)
-
Carsten Schiefner -
Malcolm Hutty -
William Sylvester